I love to barbecue on my outdoor grill. It hardly matters whether I’m cooking steak, pork, chicken, or ribs. But what does matter, for me, is the barbecue sauce. It has to taste distinctive. I like mine extra spicy.

Not all barbeque sauces are the same. Some are vinegar-based; others are made with tomato or mustard. Some have paprika; others use red pepper. How do you pick the one you want? There’s no benchmark or standard. You read the ingredients, and then you choose what you like. (Vanguard Global Chief Economist Joe Davis, a barbecue aficionado, always picks the right one.)

The same could be said for factor-based products. When you pick them for a portfolio, you’re likely adding to an already existing portfolio. You’re looking for a tilt on value, for instance, or to add an element of momentum.

But as with barbecue sauce, there can be a lot of differences and similarities between them. In order to know what you’re getting, read the bottle carefully.

When shopping for factors

How factor strategies are constructed and implemented can lead to markedly different results. It might be logical to think that because some are characterized as “indexes,” factor strategies should perform similar to one another. However, factor indexes can vary greatly, even those that have similar names and/or investment strategies. For example, there is no standard definition of value, even if a low price-to-earnings ratio is a commonly used metric.

Numerous important active decisions are made in an attempt to target a particular factor exposure. For most factor funds, these decisions are made by the index provider as part of its construction methodology. The asset manager’s responsibility is to manage the portfolio to seek to track the index. As a result, even though a fund can technically be an index fund, the index itself is an active strategy.

To give you a sense of how active decisions by index providers make a difference, we calculated historical returns for various indexes that target the value factor. The figure below shows that although these indexes may be targeting the same factor, there is a wide range of outcomes.

Value factor index returns for 2017

Source: Vanguard.

Notes: Past performance is no guarantee of future returns. The performance of an index is not an exact representation of any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index. Benchmark comparative indexes represent unmanaged or average returns on various financial assets, which can be compared with funds’ total returns for the purpose of measuring relative performance.

Understand the factor recipe

Once you determine a certain factor is worth pursuing, how do you select the investment vehicle to gain exposure to that factor?

Here are four key questions to ask:

  1. What metrics are used to represent the factor?

Let’s continue with the value example. Is the best metric price-to-book? Price-to-earnings? Both? Something else? What is the supporting evidence to suggest that the chosen metrics are a sensible way to access the style factor?

  1. What is the weighting scheme (i.e., the construction methodology)?

What is the eligible universe? Is it weighted based on each security’s exposure to the factor? Is the target factor exposure consistent? How is rebalancing handled? How diversified or concentrated is the strategy?

  1. How is the factor strategy implemented?

Is it actively managed or does it seek to track an index? Does the asset manager have significant experience effectively executing factor-oriented strategies? Is there trading flexibility? What is the expected turnover?

  1. What are the expected all-in costs?

What are the ongoing costs, such as the expense ratio? What are the transaction costs, such as bid-ask spreads, entry or exit fees, and premiums/discounts?

The bottom line is: Before selecting which factor product to buy out of all the available choices, do your homework. Choosing a factor product is like selecting any other type of strategy. Extensive due diligence is necessary (including if it tracks an index).

You are the cook. Be sure you are seasoning your portfolio with the right sauce.

I would like to thank my colleague Kelly Farley for her contributions to this blog.

Notes:

  • For more information about Vanguard funds or Vanguard ETFs®, visit institutional.vanguard.com or call 800-523-1036 to obtain a prospectus or, if available, a summary prospectus. Investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other important information are contained in the prospectus; read and consider it carefully before investing.
  • Vanguard ETF Shares are not redeemable with the issuing Fund other than in very large aggregations worth millions of dollars. Instead, investors must buy and sell Vanguard ETF Shares in the secondary market and hold those shares in a brokerage account. In doing so, the investor may incur brokerage commissions and may pay more than net asset value when buying and receive less than net asset value when selling.
  • Investments in bond funds are subject to interest rate, credit, and inflation risk.
  • Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.
  • Investments in stocks or bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country/regional risk and currency risk. These risks are especially high in emerging markets.
  • All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest.
  • Factor funds are subject to investment style risk, which is the chance that returns from the types of stocks in which the fund invests will trail returns from U.S. stock markets. Factor funds are subject to manager risk, which is the chance that poor security selection will cause the fund to underperform relevant benchmarks or other funds with a similar investment objective.